Archivo de la categoría: Formación de directivos y profesionales

The Thinking Skills That Will Set You Apart as a Leader

According to my experience, organizations tend to do very stupid things; collectivelly they are less intelligent than most of the individuals in them. Another observation is that organizations tend to reflect the virtues and defects of their leaders.

The conclussion is clear: people tend to work without thinking much, and the responsibility lies on their leaders. Are they dumb? No, or not more than the average. In fact, they usually are more intelligent than normal employees. And they are experts in their field. But they often lack some critical thinking skills that are much needed in VUCA environments. And these skills are never tought in the education system, nor in companies.

Only a few times I’ve had the chance to train managers on thinking and decision making skills. Am I the only one who realizes that there’s a need to improve the thought process of leaders? Their ego makes them think that they are already smart enough. So I was very relieved to find this very interesting article at Harvard Business Review. Here’s a summary:

What does it mean to add value? Adding value arises not just from solving a problem, but from solving the right problem, in ways that no one expected, to arrive at an even better outcome.

These kinds of solutions don’t come from our everyday ways of thinking. They come from expert thinkingcritical thinkingstrategic thinking, and systems thinking—skills that consistently make it on those ubiquitous lists of things leaders at every level have to be really good at to meet the challenges of the future.

If you’re a leader looking for your company to add value for clients and customers, or a manager looking for ways your team can add value, you need to be building these skills in your people. The problem for many leaders and managers, however, is that when we use terms like expert, critical, strategic, or systems thinking, too often we don’t know when to apply or even how to define them.

The authors explore these four distinct types of thinking skills in depth, including what they mean and when they should be used, along with some tips for using AI tools as a thinking partner.

  • Expert thinking is rooted in deep knowledge in a particular field, developed through years of experience, training, and consistent practice. Use it when a situation requires a quick, automatic response based on a well-defined set of rules, or when prior experience and knowledge can offer a clear path forward.
  • Critical thinking pushes you to pause and question assumptions. Instead of reacting quickly, you stop and analyze. Use it when experts disagree on a solution, when traditional approaches fail to solve a problem, or when the symptoms of a problem keep recurring.
  • Strategic thinking is about taking a long-term, high-level perspective, looking beyond the immediate situation. Use it when making big decisions with long-term consequences, thinking about your team’s future, or trying to anticipate how market forces and customer needs might change.
  • Systems thinking is the ability to see the interconnectedness of all the problems at hand. Use it when you need to understand a complex situation or want to identify patterns and relationships within your organization or industry.

It’s just as important to recognize that thinking skills are unlikely to be honed organically, because most of these ways of thinking are not natural. We have to deliberately engage in them. In other words, they’re not what our brains do on autopilot. (And let’s not kid ourselves: Our brains are on autopilot, out of necessity, most of the time. That’s not necessarily a bad thing.)

I encourage you to read the whole article here, and think about it. Also share this article with those you consider will appretiate it. And if you want to improve the thinking skills of your leaders, let’s talk.

You may also like past posts:

Las inundaciones de Valencia: el precio de las malas decisiones, liderazgo y sistemas organizativos

La crisis de los misiles de Kennedy – Toma de decisiones estratégicas en incertidumbre

50 sesgos cognitivos que pueden perjudicar la toma de decisiones (de otros, claro, no la tuya)

Los directivos «cuello de botella» y su impacto en las decisiones de empresa

Covid y ¿racionalidad? en la toma de decisiones estratégicas

Irracionalidad en la toma de decisiones, el día de la marmota y el Covid – Entrevista a Antonio Montero

Algunos hallazgos de psicología que explican por qué tomamos malas decisiones

La estupidez, cómo reconocerla y qué hacer con ella

Descifrando nuestro mayor enemigo: la estupidez

La paradoja de la estupidez

The Painful Reality Of Unteachable Lessons

The broken window fallacy, Troyan horse ideas, and how to avoid making terrible economic decisions

Last month I talked about goals and incentives (La importancia de los incentivos, y cómo el 99% de la gente (incluidos los directivos) no los entiende) and about how people are blind to the failure of their projects (La teoría del caballo muerto o cómo nos negamos a afrontar los problemas). Following those ideas, today I want to talk about the economic myopia of most people.

I don’t know if it is because I studied some economy or because of my experience in many organizations, but I can spot bad economic ideas from a mile, even if they are disguised in good intentions. But I don’t think I’m a genius. What surprises me is how most people accept or buy into «Troyan horse ideas«: sugar-candy proposals that will bring terrible results.

  • Why do politicians always seem to create more economic problems when they intervene to «solve» the previous ones?
  • Why can’t people understand that what seem like good ideas in the short term have bad consequences?
  • Why do we insist in the same recipes that sound attractive but have proven wrong several times in history?
  • Why don’t we understand that everything has pros and cons, and that there are no solutions, only compromises?

There many examples, like printing money, fixing prices, raising taxes and tariffs, taking money from people who work to give it to those who create nothing, doing a bad job for a customer, being dishonest, eating too much and exercicing too little, spending more than you earn, etc.

In this video we learn about the broken window fallacy and how it can help us improve our economic understanding of the world.

Some key questions that you need to ask every time you are proposed an idea:

  • What’s been broken? Why? (Root causes, not symthoms) Have we understood how the problem was created?
  • Is your proposal better or worse than the problem? Is it better or worse than other proposals? What other solutions have worked / not worked in the past? What are the pros and cons of each of them? Are you solving the problem provisionally and making it worse in the long term? What are the evident and not so evident risks?
  • How is this solution going to solve the problem? How are you going to measure its success? Will you change it if it doesn’t work or is counter productive?
  • At what cost? What are the drawbacks? What wealth is the proposal going to destroy? Will it create more problems somewhere else?
  • Who’s paying and who’s benefiting from it? Is it overall good for the society? Even so, is it fair and ethical? Does it break individual rights?
  • Is this idea yours or are you repeating someone else’s without any criticism? Do you have an emotional attachment? What are your biases and blind spots?
  • Are you risking something if your solution doesn’t work? Do you have a personal interest in it? Who will win or lose something if it works and if it doesn’t?

Next time you have or are proposed a «great idea», please use these questions to help other people think rationally.

You may also like:

¿Qué tienen que ver Djokovic, la racionalidad al tomar decisiones, la manipulación de masas y el maltrato doméstico?

Covid y ¿racionalidad? en la toma de decisiones estratégicas

Irracionalidad en la toma de decisiones, el día de la marmota y el Covid – Entrevista a Antonio Montero

Las inundaciones de Valencia: el precio de las malas decisiones, liderazgo y sistemas organizativos

2024: Imágenes, reflexiones y agradecimiento para los lectores del blog

En 2024 he cumplido 50 años y 15 del proyecto ReviTalent. Ha sido un año fructífero aunque difícil. Un año vivido intensamente, del que quería compartir en algunas imágenes y reflexiones con los lectores del blog.

He conseguido un objetivo que llevaba tiempo persiguiendo, lo que yo considero mi éxito profesional: dedicar la mayor parte (seguramente más de un 80%) de mi tiempo a proyectos Ikigai: proyectos que me gustan, que hago bien, que ayudan a otras personas y empresas, y que son rentables.

Ha sido un camino largo en la dirección que había fijado hace 4 años, y que os expliqué en este post: Novedades ReviTalent 2020. Carta personal a los lectores del blog. Al menos de momento, he conseguido vivir y trabajar de los servicios especiales diseñados en los últimos años: aventuras, experiencias, historias, y transformación individual y colectiva.

No todo han sido proyectos facturables. He conseguido escribir un libro sobre piratas del Caribe y lo que podemos aprender de los peores criminales en las mejores empresas. Espero publicarlo próximamente, os mantendré informados. Tengo otro con los cuentos que inventaba para mis hijos durante su infancia también escrito, pero ese ya veremos qué hacemos con él. También he desarrollado varias experiencias de aprendizaje nuevas y adaptado otras con nuevos formatos y contenidos.

Pero las cosas no han sido de color de rosa. No ha sido un año fácil. Un buen amigo ha tenido un derrame cerebral, y otros han tenido problemas personales y laborales. El primer trimestre fue muy flojo y el último demasiado estresante. Tengo facturas por cobrar como para vivir un año. He tenido un accidente de moto y varias complicaciones de salud, por suerte sin consecuencias graves. Las dificultades que superamos nos hacen más fuertes.

En lo personal, he tenido una armonía razonable entre vida personal y el trabajo, he navegado, he explorado campos y montes, he viajado a bellas ciudades, he empezado a tocar la guitarra, y he disfrutado con mi familia.

Y he seguido aprendiendo, tenido experiencias enriquecedoras y colaborado con gente maravillosa: clientes, socios del club Da Vinci, amigos, compañeros…

¡Muchas gracias a todos y os deseo unas felices fiestas con vuestros seres queridos y lo mejor para el 2025!

Magallanes, liderazgo y gestión del cambio

La epopeya de Magallanes y Elcano es una aventura apasionante y está llena de aprendizajes plenamente actuales sobre liderazgo y gestión del cambio.

Hace unos días he tenido la suerte de trabajar con 50 managers de una de las mayores empresas industriales de nuestro país, con nuestra metodología de historias inspiradoras.

¡Muchas gracias a ADN Training y al cliente!

Si quieres saber más:

Nuevo taller: gestión del cambio y liderazgo con Magallanes y Elcano + evento temático del Club Da Vinci

500 años del descubrimiento del estrecho de Magallanes

Liderazgo en la expedición Magallanes – Elcano. ¿Acierto o desastre?

500 años de la epopeya más asombrosa y poco conocida

La hora decisiva de Elcano. Arte, historia y aprendizaje.

Hace 499 años, Elcano culminaba la primera vuelta al mundo

Jefes, directivos, líderes

Interesante artículo y vídeo del siempre cabal Xavier Marcet en La Vanguardia, haciendo algunas distinciones interesantes entre palabras que se suelen mezclar. Te invito a leerlo.

La idea básica es que un manager debe combinar tres mentalidades: la ejecutiva (centrada en el corto plazo y los resultados), la directiva (que piensa y prepara el futuro) y la de liderazgo (que se enfoca en sacar lo mejor de las personas).

Franqueza radical y liderazgo

«¿Cómo pueden decir lo que piensan sin ser malos?» pregunta Kim Scott, asesora para CEOs y autora. Profundizando en el delicado balance entre comprensiva y exigente al liderar en el trabajo, Scott introduce la «honestidad radical» como una manera de dar críticas constructivas con compasión.

Esto es fundamental siempre que tengas que dar feedback, ya seas líder, compañero, pareja, padre, o casi cualquier situación de comunicación, conflicto o cooperación. Vamos, todo el tiempo.

Puedes verlo en Ted.com, y poner subtítulos en Español.

«Un buen maestro sabe que en todo ser humano hay grandeza». Mario Alonso Puig

¿Cuál es el potencial de un ser humano? ¿Cómo despertarlo y hacerlo crecer? ¿Cuál es la misión de un maestro?

Fantástica conferencia de Mario Alonso Puig, con interesantes historias y reflexiones que te recomiendo disfrutar.

Si te ha gustado, tal vez te interese la conferencia completa.

The art of leading teammates

In this article at HBR, Tom Brady, one of the most successful American football players, shares some of his keys for leading your teammates, and shares examples and anecdotes to illustrate them.

Some ideas (I recommend you read the whole article):

  • Leaders don’t accomplish anything by themselves. In fact, nothing of significance in life is achieved alone. To do great things, we rely on teammates. And to win, team leaders must find ways to draw the best physical, mental, and emotional performance from the players working with them.
  • Leadership comes down to two things: Do you care about your teammates and their role on the team? And do you care about winning, which is what you’re ultimately trying to do together? Leadership requires trust, and trust usually comes from deeply caring about one another and the belief that winning is about the team. You must feel passionate about both.
  • Put the team first, always, even when facing personal adversity.
  • Show appreciation for unsung colleagues.
  • Set the standard and create a culture of 100% effort.
  • Recognize teammates’ individual psychology and the best ways to motivate them.
  • Understand and complement the style of the formal leader
  • Recognize and counteract the external forces that can cause selfish behavior
  • Create opportunities to connect as people outside the office. 
  • The emotions and behaviors that define individuals are formed early.
  • Leaders work within a system.
  • It can be hard for individual team leaders to influence change across large organizations.
  • A leader’s style and influence will take time to evolve

I think that these advice applies not also to sports, but also to any team in any organization.

Besides, here are two videos explaining some of these concepts.

If you want to know more about the connection between sports and people development in companies, you may like past posts:

Lessons In Elite Leadership – Eddie Jones | Modern Wisdom

Conflicto entre la selección femenina de fútbol y su entrenador. ¿Qué podemos aprender los líderes en empresas?

Lecciones para el tenis y la vida de Roger Federer

¿El talento no existe? Talento vs. habilidad vs. éxito.

La charla de desarrollo de Modric

El éxito de la selección de baloncesto como equipo y el liderazgo de Scariolo

Presentación del libro Team! sobre rugby, empresa y valores.

Rugby y valores. Libro Team! y colaboración con Jaime Nava.

What eating too much, religions and corporations have in common

In this Brief But Spectacular interview, Yuval Harari shares very interesting perspectives from history and human evolution.

We’ll understand and connect phenomena such as human stupidity, why we eat too much, what modern corporations and old religions have in common and how believing in fiction is the human superpower.

00:00 Intro

00:26 Common behaviors explained

02:05 Writing for children

03:44 Humanity’s superpower

06:55 The paradox of wisdom

08:00 Artificial intelligence

09:37 World War III

You may also like previous posts:

Descifrando nuestro mayor enemigo: la estupidez

Psicología evolucionista y evolución cultural

Opinión sobre el libro «Tribal Leadership»

Mesa redonda: IA y RRHH. ¿El futuro del trabajo? Grabaciones e información adicional.

How to succeed in different levels of leadership

The research

Some months ago a was interviewed in a research by Talogy about the progression of leaders in their career, as I already published:

How to succeed as a leader in different levels of hierarchy – Interview to Luis González (ReviTalent) by Emily Goldsack (Talogy)

Now they’ve shared their research: «The leadership journey: insights into effective leadership progression. An international research report

It explores the perspectives
of employees, leaders, organizations, and scientific literature about:

  • The direct impact of leaders on their people at each level
  • What leadership behaviors and attributes are important at each level
  • The leadership challenges leaders face as they transition to the next level and their degree of preparedness
  • How organizations can best prepare leaders to transition successfully and be effective in their future leadership role
  • These findings offer practical and actionable insights to help build effective leaders for strong leadership pipelines.

Summary

Here are some key ideas:

  • Only 38% of leaders feel extremely or very prepared to move to the next level of leadership.
  • Enabling and supporting leaders as they progress through your organization is critical when facing tight labor markets and increased reliance on leaders to deliver results. However, only 36% of leaders surveyed received formal leadership training or development when they moved to their current leadership level.
  • Leaders of all levels feel that mentoring programs and individual coaching were in the top three most useful development opportunities
  • Leaders who made employees feel more positive emotions were also rated as more effective leaders by employees. Yet one in five employees are still experiencing stress and frustration on a very frequent basis. Employees whose leaders display negative behaviors reported a decrease in their own work performance, engagement, and overall wellbeing.
  • This reinforces the need for leadership development to focus on a human-centered approach and places emphasis on emotional intelligence
  • Employees identified being supportive, providing constructive feedback, giving autonomy, and
    communicating well as leadership behaviors that most enhance their work performance.
  • 80% of leaders felt they had to change their behavior to a moderate, large, or very large extent when they transitioned to their current leadership level.
  • First-level: Leading self vs leading others: An initial mindset change is required as individual contributors move into leadership – focusing on delegation and empowering others, appreciating individuals and communicating task expectations. First-level leaders also face complexity in managing their relationships with former peers and new colleagues.
  • Mid-level: Leading others vs leading leaders. Moving to mid-level leadership requires a further shift in mindset. There is a need to demonstrate and balance both strategic and operational capabilities and leaders at this level have many audiences to communicate with. They must recognize the need to move out of the detail and have a broader strategic focus.
  • Senior level: Leading the organization. At a senior leader level a final mindset shift is required, often recognized as the most difficult by organizations. Building and maintaining trust and providing clarity in communication are essential at this level. Leading the organization involves a step away from day-to-day management and a move towards big-picture strategic thinking, managing a greater breadth of relationships and empowering managers and teams.

However, there’s much more to learn. I encourage you to read the full report here.