Archivo de la etiqueta: Leadership

The Thinking Skills That Will Set You Apart as a Leader

According to my experience, organizations tend to do very stupid things; collectivelly they are less intelligent than most of the individuals in them. Another observation is that organizations tend to reflect the virtues and defects of their leaders.

The conclussion is clear: people tend to work without thinking much, and the responsibility lies on their leaders. Are they dumb? No, or not more than the average. In fact, they usually are more intelligent than normal employees. And they are experts in their field. But they often lack some critical thinking skills that are much needed in VUCA environments. And these skills are never tought in the education system, nor in companies.

Only a few times I’ve had the chance to train managers on thinking and decision making skills. Am I the only one who realizes that there’s a need to improve the thought process of leaders? Their ego makes them think that they are already smart enough. So I was very relieved to find this very interesting article at Harvard Business Review. Here’s a summary:

What does it mean to add value? Adding value arises not just from solving a problem, but from solving the right problem, in ways that no one expected, to arrive at an even better outcome.

These kinds of solutions don’t come from our everyday ways of thinking. They come from expert thinkingcritical thinkingstrategic thinking, and systems thinking—skills that consistently make it on those ubiquitous lists of things leaders at every level have to be really good at to meet the challenges of the future.

If you’re a leader looking for your company to add value for clients and customers, or a manager looking for ways your team can add value, you need to be building these skills in your people. The problem for many leaders and managers, however, is that when we use terms like expert, critical, strategic, or systems thinking, too often we don’t know when to apply or even how to define them.

The authors explore these four distinct types of thinking skills in depth, including what they mean and when they should be used, along with some tips for using AI tools as a thinking partner.

  • Expert thinking is rooted in deep knowledge in a particular field, developed through years of experience, training, and consistent practice. Use it when a situation requires a quick, automatic response based on a well-defined set of rules, or when prior experience and knowledge can offer a clear path forward.
  • Critical thinking pushes you to pause and question assumptions. Instead of reacting quickly, you stop and analyze. Use it when experts disagree on a solution, when traditional approaches fail to solve a problem, or when the symptoms of a problem keep recurring.
  • Strategic thinking is about taking a long-term, high-level perspective, looking beyond the immediate situation. Use it when making big decisions with long-term consequences, thinking about your team’s future, or trying to anticipate how market forces and customer needs might change.
  • Systems thinking is the ability to see the interconnectedness of all the problems at hand. Use it when you need to understand a complex situation or want to identify patterns and relationships within your organization or industry.

It’s just as important to recognize that thinking skills are unlikely to be honed organically, because most of these ways of thinking are not natural. We have to deliberately engage in them. In other words, they’re not what our brains do on autopilot. (And let’s not kid ourselves: Our brains are on autopilot, out of necessity, most of the time. That’s not necessarily a bad thing.)

I encourage you to read the whole article here, and think about it. Also share this article with those you consider will appretiate it. And if you want to improve the thinking skills of your leaders, let’s talk.

You may also like past posts:

Las inundaciones de Valencia: el precio de las malas decisiones, liderazgo y sistemas organizativos

La crisis de los misiles de Kennedy – Toma de decisiones estratégicas en incertidumbre

50 sesgos cognitivos que pueden perjudicar la toma de decisiones (de otros, claro, no la tuya)

Los directivos «cuello de botella» y su impacto en las decisiones de empresa

Covid y ¿racionalidad? en la toma de decisiones estratégicas

Irracionalidad en la toma de decisiones, el día de la marmota y el Covid – Entrevista a Antonio Montero

Algunos hallazgos de psicología que explican por qué tomamos malas decisiones

La estupidez, cómo reconocerla y qué hacer con ella

Descifrando nuestro mayor enemigo: la estupidez

La paradoja de la estupidez

The Painful Reality Of Unteachable Lessons

La teoría del caballo muerto o cómo nos negamos a afrontar los problemas

Encontré en fb y luego en el blog de balcón40 una buena metáfora muy aplicable en la empresa y la política, e incluso en nuestras vidas personales: la teoría del caballo muerto.

Esta teoría parece ser que se basa en un dicho de los indios de Dakota, quienes aparentemente decían que “cuando descubres que estás montando un caballo muerto, la mejor estrategia es desmontar”.

Parece obvio, ¿verdad? pues no debe serlo tanto, porque es bastante común continuar invirtiendo tiempo, recursos y esfuerzos en un proyecto improductivo o definitivamente fallido. En vez de abandonarlo, muchas veces las organizaciones y personas implementan estrategias destinadas a intentar revivir al caballo muerto, como por ejemplo:

  • Comprar un látigo más fuerte, o una nueva silla de montar, para ver si el caballo muerto resucita (mejora sus resultados) si le doy con látigo más fuerte (y más caro)
  • Cambiar los jinetes, o sea, asignar a alguien nuevo a una tarea ya fallida
  • Nombrar un comité para estudiar al caballo, o lo que es lo mismo, gastar tiempo y recursos en ver qué es lo que va mal sin llegar a tomar ninguna acción.
  • Relajar las normas o los requisitos de las prestaciones esperadas de los caballos, o revisitar el concepto de muerto, de manera que se puedan incluir a los caballos muertos en dichas normas y así pasen más desapercibidos.
  • Reclasificar los caballos muertos como seres vivos discapacitados, o con cualquier otro eufemismo para no reconocer que el pobre caballo ha fallecido.
  • Atar varios caballos muertos juntos para ver si así aumentan la velocidad. O como decía un antiguo jefe mío, es cuando el más feo y la más fea de la clase van juntos al baile de graduación. Está bien ir, pero la relación va a tener poco futuro.
  • Mejorar la alimentación del caballo para ver si así el caballo muerto corre más o lo que es lo mismo, proporcionar financiación adicional y/o formación para mejorar el desempeño del proyecto.
  • Declarar que como un caballo muerto no necesita ser alimentado, cuesta menos y por consiguiente contribuye a mejorar los resultados de la empresa.
  • Re-escribir el rendimiento esperado, para que el del caballo muerto sea aceptable.
  • Ascender al caballo muerto a un puesto de responsabilidad y contratar a otro caballo para hacer el trabajo.

Muchos años después que los indios de Dakota, Peter Drucker, el guru del management, dijo más o menos lo mismo pero con otras palabras: «No hay nada tan inútil como hacer eficientemente lo que no debería hacerse en absoluto.» O sea, está muy bien buscar eficiencias, pero es inútil y contraproducente hacer eficientes las tareas incorrectas.

Es un problema común en muchas organizaciones la reticencia a abandonar proyectos muertos. Sucede por varios motivos:

  • Es la idea del gran jefe y nadie se atreve a declararla finalmente inútil
  • Hay demasiados compromisos adquiridos con anterioridad y nos empeñamos en hacerla funcionar como sea (lo que en economía se llama coste hundido)
  • Fue una idea de éxito en un principio pero cuyo momento ha pasado, y sin embargo seguimos trabajando en ello casi por inercia.
  • Cada persona sabe que el caballo está muerto pero nadie se atreve a discrepar con el grupo (pensamiento grupal)
  • Tenemos un apego emocional con el caballo y nos duele demasiado siquiera considerar que está muerto
  • Disonancia cognitiva: Ante la discrepancia entre lo que vemos y lo que creemos, descartamos lo que vemos para no tener que cambiar nuestras creencias

Esto también es aplicable también en el ámbito personal. Cuantas veces tenemos la sensación de que estamos en un fin de ciclo, que ya hemos hecho todo lo que había que hacer en el proyecto y que de ahí no se puede sacar más. O con una pareja con la que llevamos tiempo intentando de todo.

En esas situaciones, lo mejor es abrazar el cambio, innovar y estar dispuestos a desmontar el caballo y buscar otro camino a seguir. Lo difícil normalmente es reconocer que el caballo que montamos ha fallecido, porque era nuestro caballo, le teníamos cariño, dedicamos en el pasado mucho esfuerzo a alimentarlo y verlo crecer, pero hay que asumir que todo llega a su fin y que lo mejor es bajarse de él.

Y esto no sólo es aplicable para ti mismo, sino que es importante entenderlo para facilitar la gestión del cambio. Aunque tú estés intentando librarte del cadáver apestoso del caballo, en tu empresa seguro que hay personas que siguen apegadas a él. No sirve de mucho forzarles si no empiezan por entender que su querido caballo está muerto. En lugar de vencer esa resistencia al cambio, empieza por desactivarla haciéndoles tomar conciencia de que su caballo está muerto.

Acabo con una pregunta retadora y una reflexión:

  • ¿Qué caballos muertos has montado en el pasado? ¿Hay alguno al que sigues apegado en el presente?
  • ¿Qué caballos muertos tienen otras personas que para ti resultan evidentes? ¿Cómo ayudarles a reconocerlo sin generar resistencia?
  • Si tienes dudas al respecto, tal vez te ayude lo que me dijo una vez una amiga: lo más difícil no es tomar una decisión, sino darte cuenta de que en el fondo ya has tomado tu decisión.

«The tide is turning!» – Konstantin Kisin’s HILARIOUS speech to world leaders

If you don’t know Konstantin Kisin, he is a comedian but also a speaker who defends free speech, western civilization and values. He knows what he is talking about because his family escaped from the Soviet Union.

He is a Sunday Times bestselling author, satirist, social commentator, and creator and co-host of free speech podcast TRIGGERnometry. In 2022, he published An Immigrant’s Love Letter to the West.

I came across this speech at ARC, and I found it wonderful both in content and in the way he delivers it. Enjoy it! Besides, we can all learn from his public speaking skills, second to none.

00:00 Introduction & Personal Reflections

00:21 Cultural Change & Turning Tides

02:04 Free Speech & The Fear of Open Debate

03:08 Challenges in the West: Crime, Identity, & Leadership

06:09 The Danger of Forgetting Our Foundations

09:50 Responsibility, Innovation & The Fight for the Future

12:38 Winning the Argument on Identity & Progress

14:11 A Call to Action & Final Reflections

Stop using this, it’s killing your conversations! Advice from a body language expert.

Another excellent interview at Diary Of A Ceo, regarding body language. Vanessa Van Edwards is the founder of ‘Science of People’, which gives people science-backed skills to improve communication and leadership. She is also the bestselling author of ‘Captivate: The Science of Succeeding with People’ and ‘Cues: Master the Secret Language of Charismatic Communication’.

Here are some take-aways:

  • Gestures Over Words (00:00): Our brain is 12.5 times more likely to trust a person’s gestures over their words, as gestures are harder to fake.
  • Importance of Cues (00:27): Behavioral researcher Vanessa Van Edwards emphasizes that highly successful people understand the hidden language of cues (non-verbal communication) that boost both warmth and competence in social interactions.
  • Five Warmth Cues (01:16): For those who are perceived as intimidating or hard to talk to, using warmth cues like authentic smiling and tilting your head can help make you more approachable.
  • Contagion of Emotions (35:45): Being around high performers improves your performance, while being around low performers can decrease it by 30%, showing how emotions are contagious.
  • Body Language in Presentations (40:00): Effective speakers use gestures and different vocal tones to emphasize importance, numbers, or storytelling, which engages listeners more deeply.
  • Non-Verbal Bridge (37:55): Small, non-verbal gestures, such as a light tap or slight touch, can help build trust and create emotional connections in relationships.
  • The Power of Aggressively Liking People (22:35): The key to building connections is to make others feel liked first, which can lead them to like you back.
  • Avoiding Overused Questions (1:24:30): Asking «What do you do?» can be boring and put people on autopilot; instead, ask more personal, thought-provoking questions to foster genuine connections.
  • Imperfect Social Interactions (2:00:13): Making mistakes, like spilling something or being imperfect, can actually make you more relatable and create deeper bonds in social situations.
  • Social Strengths and Connection (2:31:32): Understanding and playing to your social strengths (whether storytelling, empathy, or humor) is key to creating more meaningful relationships and better interactions.

And this is an index of all the contents:

00:00 Intro

02:13 The Crucial Role of Cues for Success

03:45 I’m a Recovered Awkward Person

05:36 What’s an Ambivert

07:28 One Word Can Change the Way People Think

09:39 The Most Fundamental Skill to Invest In

12:41 The Resting B*tch Face Effect

16:01 Do Not Fake Smile!

18:29 The 97 Cues to Be Warm & Competent

21:44 The Formula to a Perfect Conversation

24:37 Science Reveals Why Some People Are Extremely Popular

28:34 Message People Telling Them This…

33:22 The Luck Experiment

35:05 Being Around Successful People Is Contagious

41:55 The Importance of Hand Gestures

43:38 Hand Tricks to Be Liked

54:15 The Scientific Formula to Be More Charismatic

56:47 The Danger Zone of Being Too Warm or Competent

58:45 The Power Cues

1:07:55 How to Spot a Liar

1:15:23 If You’ve Been Told You’re Intimidating, Do This

1:18:37 Don’t Let Anyone Use This With You

1:21:45 The 6 Questions to Connect With Someone

1:34:20 Leaning Too Much Towards Someone…

1:39:03 How to Greet Someone

1:49:42 How to Master Messaging

1:54:40 Personal Branding

1:59:01 Improve Your Dating Life With These Tips

2:04:27 Body Language and Brain Connection

2:06:33 Are You Awkward? Watch This

2:10:14 How to Get Someone to Approach You

2:15:08 How to Make Friends as an Adult

2:18:57 AirPods Are Killing Friendships

2:22:16 Ads

2:24:08 How to Spot a Liar

2:30:05 Toxic Relationships

2:32:34 How to Start a Conversation With a Stranger

2:37:00 How to Get Started With All This Knowledge

Franqueza radical y liderazgo

«¿Cómo pueden decir lo que piensan sin ser malos?» pregunta Kim Scott, asesora para CEOs y autora. Profundizando en el delicado balance entre comprensiva y exigente al liderar en el trabajo, Scott introduce la «honestidad radical» como una manera de dar críticas constructivas con compasión.

Esto es fundamental siempre que tengas que dar feedback, ya seas líder, compañero, pareja, padre, o casi cualquier situación de comunicación, conflicto o cooperación. Vamos, todo el tiempo.

Puedes verlo en Ted.com, y poner subtítulos en Español.

The art of leading teammates

In this article at HBR, Tom Brady, one of the most successful American football players, shares some of his keys for leading your teammates, and shares examples and anecdotes to illustrate them.

Some ideas (I recommend you read the whole article):

  • Leaders don’t accomplish anything by themselves. In fact, nothing of significance in life is achieved alone. To do great things, we rely on teammates. And to win, team leaders must find ways to draw the best physical, mental, and emotional performance from the players working with them.
  • Leadership comes down to two things: Do you care about your teammates and their role on the team? And do you care about winning, which is what you’re ultimately trying to do together? Leadership requires trust, and trust usually comes from deeply caring about one another and the belief that winning is about the team. You must feel passionate about both.
  • Put the team first, always, even when facing personal adversity.
  • Show appreciation for unsung colleagues.
  • Set the standard and create a culture of 100% effort.
  • Recognize teammates’ individual psychology and the best ways to motivate them.
  • Understand and complement the style of the formal leader
  • Recognize and counteract the external forces that can cause selfish behavior
  • Create opportunities to connect as people outside the office. 
  • The emotions and behaviors that define individuals are formed early.
  • Leaders work within a system.
  • It can be hard for individual team leaders to influence change across large organizations.
  • A leader’s style and influence will take time to evolve

I think that these advice applies not also to sports, but also to any team in any organization.

Besides, here are two videos explaining some of these concepts.

If you want to know more about the connection between sports and people development in companies, you may like past posts:

Lessons In Elite Leadership – Eddie Jones | Modern Wisdom

Conflicto entre la selección femenina de fútbol y su entrenador. ¿Qué podemos aprender los líderes en empresas?

Lecciones para el tenis y la vida de Roger Federer

¿El talento no existe? Talento vs. habilidad vs. éxito.

La charla de desarrollo de Modric

El éxito de la selección de baloncesto como equipo y el liderazgo de Scariolo

Presentación del libro Team! sobre rugby, empresa y valores.

Rugby y valores. Libro Team! y colaboración con Jaime Nava.

Mental health, the young men’s crisis, success, wisdom and comedy

I came across an intriguing summary of the interview with Jimmy Carr by Diary of a CEO (Steven Bartlett), a very successful entrepreneur and interviewer.

Jimmy is a famous (and controversial) stand-up comedian and showman, but I wasn’t expecting him to be an excellent philosopher with powerful ideas about many serious topics.

I liked it so much that I searched for the whole interview. It is a long conversation, but really worth the time. It will inspire you and make you a wiser and better person.

00:00 Intro

02:01 How Are You, Jimmy?

03:07 Every Single Person Has Life Dysmorphia

08:59 What Is the Point of All This Work?

12:35 What Is Our End Goal?

14:08 People Crave the Success Not the Journey

16:47 You Should Be Feeling Imposter Syndrome

18:45 I Entertained My Sick Mother

19:54 The Unmeasurable Stuff Is the Important One

24:29 Depression

25:46 Men’s Mental Health

27:30 What Is It to Be a Man

33:25 Losing My Religion

33:52 How Do You Deal with Grief in Your Life?

35:19 The Passing of Sean Lock

38:27 Business Is Life

39:12 The Issue Is Young People Are Not Given Enough Agency

41:52 How Comedy Teaches You to Be a Good Communicator

45:06 The Importance of Taking Risks

52:38 How To Deal with Rejection

55:31 Knowing Who You Are & What You Want to Do

58:44 Is It Motivation, Luck or Talent?

01:02:14 Being Cancelled

01:06:12 Would You Erase Your Worst Moments?

01:15:26 Artificial Intelligence

01:26:37 Self Expression

01:30:51 Jimmy’s Eating Disorder

01:35:31 Advice to Younger People

01:38:25 Why You Should Sweat the Small Stuff

01:42:45 Having Confidence

01:43:40 Netflix Special

01:46:09 Dave Chapelle Attack

01:50:38 What Would You Tell Your Kids?

How to succeed in different levels of leadership

The research

Some months ago a was interviewed in a research by Talogy about the progression of leaders in their career, as I already published:

How to succeed as a leader in different levels of hierarchy – Interview to Luis González (ReviTalent) by Emily Goldsack (Talogy)

Now they’ve shared their research: «The leadership journey: insights into effective leadership progression. An international research report

It explores the perspectives
of employees, leaders, organizations, and scientific literature about:

  • The direct impact of leaders on their people at each level
  • What leadership behaviors and attributes are important at each level
  • The leadership challenges leaders face as they transition to the next level and their degree of preparedness
  • How organizations can best prepare leaders to transition successfully and be effective in their future leadership role
  • These findings offer practical and actionable insights to help build effective leaders for strong leadership pipelines.

Summary

Here are some key ideas:

  • Only 38% of leaders feel extremely or very prepared to move to the next level of leadership.
  • Enabling and supporting leaders as they progress through your organization is critical when facing tight labor markets and increased reliance on leaders to deliver results. However, only 36% of leaders surveyed received formal leadership training or development when they moved to their current leadership level.
  • Leaders of all levels feel that mentoring programs and individual coaching were in the top three most useful development opportunities
  • Leaders who made employees feel more positive emotions were also rated as more effective leaders by employees. Yet one in five employees are still experiencing stress and frustration on a very frequent basis. Employees whose leaders display negative behaviors reported a decrease in their own work performance, engagement, and overall wellbeing.
  • This reinforces the need for leadership development to focus on a human-centered approach and places emphasis on emotional intelligence
  • Employees identified being supportive, providing constructive feedback, giving autonomy, and
    communicating well as leadership behaviors that most enhance their work performance.
  • 80% of leaders felt they had to change their behavior to a moderate, large, or very large extent when they transitioned to their current leadership level.
  • First-level: Leading self vs leading others: An initial mindset change is required as individual contributors move into leadership – focusing on delegation and empowering others, appreciating individuals and communicating task expectations. First-level leaders also face complexity in managing their relationships with former peers and new colleagues.
  • Mid-level: Leading others vs leading leaders. Moving to mid-level leadership requires a further shift in mindset. There is a need to demonstrate and balance both strategic and operational capabilities and leaders at this level have many audiences to communicate with. They must recognize the need to move out of the detail and have a broader strategic focus.
  • Senior level: Leading the organization. At a senior leader level a final mindset shift is required, often recognized as the most difficult by organizations. Building and maintaining trust and providing clarity in communication are essential at this level. Leading the organization involves a step away from day-to-day management and a move towards big-picture strategic thinking, managing a greater breadth of relationships and empowering managers and teams.

However, there’s much more to learn. I encourage you to read the full report here.

How to succeed as a leader in different levels of hierarchy – Interview to Luis González (ReviTalent) by Emily Goldsack (Talogy)

For a change, today I am not interviewing but being interviewed by Emily Goldsack, from Talogy.

They are doing an international research on leadership and specifically on the progression of managers in their careers, from line management to middle and top management. I was glad to share with them (and now with you) my experience developing leaders in many companies for 25 years. (Thanks, Antonio, for putting us in touch)

I hope you find it interesting, specially if you are starting or moving up in your career as a manager. You can also share it with managers who are doing so.

00:00 What leadership behaviours we expect from leaders in different levels of hierarchy?

04:20 How do these changes develop as managers move up? What are some of the things managers need to stop doing to allocate time to the new challenges?

07:05 Do you have a leadership framework? Self, others and task management & decision making processes.

10:37 How do you differentiate and train these skills between leadership levels?

13:40 What do leaders find more challenging when they move up levels?

20:11 Which level transition is the hardest to make? How do you support people in these transitions and levels?

22:55 Is there anything specific for the development of leaders in these different levels? Is traditional training adequate for top managers?

27:10 Wasting money in training vs. investing in transformation.

30:00 Cultural differences and leadership

34:47 Diversity in generations and values